tldr: Testsigma pricing has two tiers: Pro (for growing teams) and Enterprise (for large-scale organizations). Both require contacting sales for a quote. Pro includes codeless automation across web, mobile, and API with 800+ browser/OS combos and 2,000+ real devices. Enterprise adds SSO, on-premises deployment, and consulting. A free trial is available.
Introduction
Testsigma is an AI-powered, codeless test automation platform covering web, mobile, desktop, API, and Salesforce testing. For teams evaluating it against BrowserStack or LambdaTest, pricing matters.
Here's the frustrating part: Testsigma doesn't publish prices. Both tiers require a sales conversation. BrowserStack and LambdaTest put pricing on their websites. Testsigma makes you ask. That makes comparison harder, and several reviewers note this as a pain point.
The pitch to justify the sales call: one platform that replaces your test automation framework, test management tool, and maintenance effort. Whether that math works depends on your team size and current tooling costs.
The two plans
Pro
For growing teams that need codeless automation:
- Codeless test creation using plain English (NLP).
- Web, mobile web, iOS, Android, and REST API testing.
- Unlimited applications, projects, and testing minutes.
- 800+ browser/OS combinations and 2,000+ real devices.
- Parallel execution.
- 30+ integrations (CI/CD, Jira, Slack, Teams).
- Auto-healing scripts.
- 5 GB cloud storage per parallel instance.
- 24/5 priority support.
Enterprise
Everything in Pro, plus:
- SAML 2.0 single sign-on (SSO).
- Public, private, or on-premises deployment.
- Desktop application testing.
- IP whitelisting and local testing.
- Consulting and training services.
- Custom SLAs and compliance support.
What drives the price
Testsigma is subscription-based with annual contracts. The actual number depends on:
- Parallel execution slots: More parallels = faster test cycles = higher cost. This is the biggest pricing lever, same as BrowserStack and LambdaTest.
- Team size: User seats affect the quote.
- Cloud storage: 5 GB per parallel instance on Pro. More storage costs more.
- Add-ons: Testsigma Copilot (AI assistant) and private grid hosting are optional extras.
- Deployment model: On-premises or private cloud (Enterprise only) costs more than standard cloud.
Testsigma vs competitor pricing
| Factor | Testsigma | BrowserStack | LambdaTest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Contact sales | Published tiers | Published tiers |
| Free plan | No (free trial) | No (free trial) | Yes (limited) |
| Codeless testing | Yes (NLP-based) | No | No |
| Browser/OS combos | 800+ | 3,500+ | 3,000+ |
| Real devices | 2,000+ | 30,000+ | 3,000+ |
| AI features | Copilot, auto-healing, agentic AI | AI test generation | Kane AI |
| On-premises option | Yes (Enterprise) | No | No |
Direct price comparison is hard without Testsigma's published numbers. The argument in Testsigma's favor: if you're currently paying for a test management tool (TestRail), a cloud grid (BrowserStack), and investing engineering hours in maintenance, Testsigma might cost less total. The argument against: you won't know until you sit through a sales call.
Teams that want codeless, AI-native testing in a single platform should get a Testsigma quote. Teams that need the widest device coverage lean toward BrowserStack. Budget-conscious teams often start with LambdaTest.
FAQs
Does Testsigma have a free plan? No. There's a free trial and a free open-source Community Edition, but no ongoing free tier.
Why doesn't Testsigma publish pricing? Probably to enable custom quoting based on team size and usage. It's common in enterprise SaaS but frustrating for teams trying to compare options quickly.
What's included in the Pro plan? Codeless testing across web, mobile, and API. 800+ browser/OS combos, 2,000+ real devices, auto-healing, 30+ integrations, and 24/5 support.
Does Testsigma offer on-premises deployment? Yes, on the Enterprise plan. Public, private, and on-premises options are available.
Is it cheaper than BrowserStack? Impossible to say without a quote. Testsigma bundles more features (codeless automation, test management, AI maintenance) into one tool, which could reduce total tooling costs. BrowserStack charges for each product separately.
Is Testsigma worth it for small teams? Maybe not. The Pro plan targets growing teams. Solo developers or very small teams may find it more than they need. Consider the open-source edition first.
Conclusion
Testsigma's pricing is quote-based, which makes budgeting harder but allows custom packaging. The Pro plan covers most teams' needs. Enterprise adds deployment flexibility and compliance features. The real question is whether one platform replacing multiple tools (test framework, test management, cloud grid, maintenance effort) saves you money overall. The free trial lets you validate the platform before the sales conversation. For comparison, see BrowserStack pricing and LambdaTest pricing.
